Mon, 10 Oct 2011

Whales aren't worth the worry

By Michael Laws

If there is one great weakness within western society it is unthinking sentimentalism. Nothing induces worse sentimentality than the anthropomorphic excesses of animal lovers and activists.

New Zealand has been in the grip of such hysteria for decades. Wallowing in a benign belief that animals – and particularly mammals – are sort of special class kiddies. They may not do much but there is an especial care that their vulnerability demands.

Which is why the plight of animals tends to invoke a media frenzy as opposed to the plight of children. The SPCA is particularly creepy. All that money and energy on animals when so many abused kids need such champions.

In fact, that's the problem with all animal activists. They have sacrificed their true humanity in an odd effort to strike an empathetic chord with creatures possessing the self-awareness of a snail. One day, I'm sure, it will be classified as a mental condition.

The fact is that animals exist for us. Primarily for our food and then for our entertainment. To emote with creatures that you eat is just perverse. To want to save some species – simply because they are bigger and cuter than others – is equally nuts.

Enter the Japanese whaling fleet. Assuming the role of pantomime villain for harpooning creatures that are not in any danger of extinction. The Antarctic minke whale population is estimated as anything between 300,000 and 750,000. The annual percentage to be taken is derisively tiny.

That the International Whaling Commission don't know exactly how many minke there are is a commentary upon their appalling research. Ironically, the Japanese are doing that for them.

Quite why the Japanese feel compelled to eat this blubbery beast is beyond me. But they do. And they have found a legal loophole in the IWC's rules and regulations to legitimately achieve this annual cull.

Of course, New Zealanders are outraged.

First, we believe the whale to be endangered and internationally protected. The minke is not and there is no legally recognised whale sanctuary in the Southern Ocean. There is simply a voluntary agreement amongst a distinct minority of the world's nations.

There is evidence that larger whale species – the humpback and the sperm – are making a considerable comeback from when they were ruthlessly hunted by, gee, the same western nations that are getting all upset at Japan. Including New Zealand.

Second, we think that whales are special. But more special than what? Fish? Other mammals? The fact is that they are not.

They are a food source. No different in IQ than the cows, sheep, pigs or horses that routinely end up in our stomachs or that of our pets. We hunt feral deer in this country. And they are awfully cute. Magnificent even, with their impressive horns and Bambi-like countenance.

Ah, but we farm those domestic stock, say animal activists. Yes, we do. We exploit them to our human end and then we kill them. All those gamboling lambs so happy and cute and running to their mummys. We slit their throats, strip their skin and chop them up. Yum.

So is the answer that we should farm whales? Well, we don't do that to fish. In fact, we catch and catch and eat and eat. And their deaths are equally obnoxious. We let them drown out of the water. Slowly.

And then there are the practical difficulties of farming a minke – that grows to roughly four times the size of a human. No, better to leave them swimming and take just the merest number so as not to trouble their reproduction. Which is what the Japanese do.

If the argument is that whales don't die instantly, and suffer needlessly, then concentrate upon finding that solution. Improvements have certainly been made. Research suggests that two-thirds of all minke die almost instantly once the exploding harpoon enters their body. That number was estimated at 20% a couple of decades ago.

The reaction of the Australian and New Zealand governments has verged on hysteria. At least, publicly. Privately, the Aussies were trying to do a deal on a restricted whaling catch while talking tough about International Court action. WikiLeaks exposed their hypocrisy for what it was.

Similarly Labour leader Phil Goff has gone bonkers on this issue. Send the New Zealand Navy down, he says. This after threats from the Sea Shepherd about launching kamikaze raids against the Japanese whaling fleet. In response, the Japanese government is sending a frigate or two to protect their countrymen.

Goff wants us to send our latest navy outrigger to enter that fray. Yep, starting a war over a few non-endangered whales is how desperate the Labour leader has become.

But this is the season of sentimentality. And the opposition wish to respond. A shame that we were not so passionate about the children of our human ferals. They truly are an endangered. Every day.

Sunday Star Times, 9th October 2011

19 opinions

Become a fan of RadioLIVE on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post your opinion

Name:

Email:

(Won't be published)

Opinion:

1

By Lee

I suppose you've got what you want and crave Michael, a bit of attention. I, and most New Zealanders, agreed with your banning of gang patches, but now you seem to be just after publicity at all costs. It's no wonder that you can't safely go out in public anymore. I always thought Ken Mair was a racist little twerp, but I know who I'll be cheering for come December.

(1)
(0)
1

By Lee

Both the submissions below are from people who spend their whole lives on facebook attacking anyone who defends animals. It is interesting hearing Hank talk of imposing "their will on another nation" when he is completely pro his own country's war. None of these people know anything about scientific evidence of cetacean intelligence, they choose to ignore it. Their own lives serve no purpose, so they try to make people who care about animals (which is most) seem like outsiders to try and cheer themselves up. One even threatened to throw acid on my friend's 3 year old daughter, because he saw a photo of her wearing a sea shepherd top. Hank here condoned this. This is the calibre of some of your correspondents. Get a life.

(0)
(3)
1

By Hank Melville

Read the comments below. A few are unemotional and fact-based, the rest are emotional drivel. As the author above said, "this is the season of sentimentality"... perhaps we could attend to our own houses first and get them in order. All of those who loose their crocodile tears for the whales might be better served if they first look over their own lives and choices and ensure that their own problems in their own nations are solved first. If one imposes their will on another nation before their own, it smacks of cultural imperialism and racism, especially when one reads the vile comments below.

(1)
(3)
1

By Ford Elms

Animal rights is not a "movement", it is an industry. It makes its profits misleading the public and manipulating them emotionally. Why does the public think minkes are endangered, or that there is widespread cruelty in farming, or that Canadian sealers skin seals alive? Because the ARI tells them so, and, again, fakes the "evidence". It is ironic that animal rights industry workers remain the only people ever found to have been involved in skinning a seal alive, to make propaganda to falsely accuse innocent fishermen. The animal rights industry exploits innocent working people for profit while ignoring real environmental disasters, disasters which their victims often suffer from. An example is the dishonest and slanderous campaign against Canadian sealing, a campaign that went on at the same time that traditional fishermen in Newfoundland, the victims of the ARI's vicious attacks, were trying to warn that industrial fishing methods were destroying the northern cod stock, once the largest such stock in the world. The ARI, was too bust lying about and concocting false evidence against those self same traditional fishermen to actually pay attention. Then the stock collapsed, those fishermen's lives were destroyed, rural communities were devastated as an entire generation had to leave to find work. The ARI are modern day robber barons, exploiting innocent working class people for profit, attacking them, slandering them, and attempting to destroy their livelihoods, all the while ignoring real environmental issues while hypocritically claiming to be "conservationists". Opposing the animal rights industry is an act of social justice. The attacks on Japanese whaling are another manifestation of that exploitative behaviour and should be opposed for the same reason. Exploiting workers is unjust. And, when it comes to the animal rights industry, the Emperor has no clothes and they deserve to be exposed for the dishonest, amoral, exploitative cultural imperialists they are.

(6)
(3)
1

By Ford Elms

Animal rights is not a "movement", it is an industry. It makes its profits misleading the public and manipulating them emotionally. Why does the public think minkes are endangered, or that there is widespread cruelty in farming, or that Canadian sealers skin seals alive? Because the ARI tells them so, and, again, fakes the "evidence". It is ironic that animal rights industry workers remain the only people ever found to have been involved in skinning a seal alive, to make propaganda to falsely accuse innocent fishermen. The animal rights industry exploits innocent working people for profit while ignoring real environmental disasters, disasters which their victims often suffer from. An example is the dishonest and slanderous campaign against Canadian sealing, a campaign that went on at the same time that traditional fishermen in Newfoundland, the victims of the ARI's vicious attacks, were trying to warn that industrial fishing methods were destroying the northern cod stock, once the largest such stock in the world. The ARI, was too bust lying about and concocting false evidence against those self same traditional fishermen to actually pay attention. Then the stock collapsed, those fishermen's lives were destroyed, rural communities were devastated as an entire generation had to leave to find work. The ARI are modern day robber barons, exploiting innocent working class people for profit, attacking them, slandering them, and attempting to destroy their livelihoods, all the while ignoring real environmental issues while hypocritically claiming to be "conservationists". Opposing the animal rights industry is an act of social justice. The attacks on Japanese whaling are another manifestation of that exploitative behaviour and should be opposed for the same reason. Exploiting workers is unjust. And, when it comes to the animal rights industry, the Emperor has no clothes and they deserve to be exposed for the dishonest, amoral, exploitative cultural imperialists they are.

(4)
(3)
1

By Michelle Shaw

You really are a complete fool Michael Laws. I can't believe some of the nonsense you wrote. This can only help end your career as you obviously don't care about what the people want or think. Did you fail math class? How can you possibly believe human children are endangered? The only danger I see here is if your twisted sense of reality is actually taken seriously.

(4)
(4)
1

By Lesley Rainbow

Having worked as an active volunteer in animal welfare for almost 40 years, all I can say to you Michael is to read the book "When Elephants Weep" by veterinarian Jeffrey Moussaieff Masson and Susan McCarthy.

I certainly hope that there are no pets in your household.

Thanking you.

(6)
(4)
1

By Nicolai Gottlieb Stoff

I'm proud to call myself an Animal Rights Activist and I have empathy for you (the author) and thereby has empathy for a creature possessing the self-awareness (and intelligence)of a snail!! This "article" is nothing but a load of BS and brown nosing of the Japanese conducting an INSANE form of animal abuse!!You clearly hasn't one inch of knowledge about the marine mammals and their intelligence!! I really hope that at the end of the day you will sit down and understand how big a jerk you in fact are!!!

(9)
(4)