Audio

Rate:
1 ratings
Views:1526

Seth Shostak, the head of the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence, SETI, on the possibility of detecting intelligent life in the universe - Audio

Mon, 10 May 2010 15:20
Weekend Variety Wireless with Graeme Hill.

Post your opinion

Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Opinion:
By alex

I wager $1 that data betraying exobiological activity quite profoundly distinct from common expectation already exists in the planetary data system under cassini huygens mission. Whether is sentient or not is moot lol...

(0)   (0)
By Andrew Planet

Hi there again Graeme. I was pondering about what you'd written and I reckon that you should not worry about being anthropic by having those same thoughts as long as you consider that any intelligent lifeform in the Universe could also have them. You could compare that to Hydrogen and the other chemical elements being ubiquitous in the Universe. The Universe objectively perceived is neither a warm caring state of being that look after your personal species' existence or a '' cold unfeeling place that just doesn't give a damn.... ''

I elucidate more on the matter at my simple website

www.sciencepantheism.com

Great radio show

Andrew planet (Legal, bona fide name)

(0)   (0)
By Andrew Planet

To be objective us humans must avoid being anthropic. Michio Kaku mentioned Fermi's Paradox in the Larry King's CNN debate that included Seth Shostak, following the first transmission of Steven Hawking's ''Into the Universe.'' Fermi's Paradox seems to infer that in the short period that humans have been able to transmit data using technology and the scant interstellar distances these transmissions have covered, we ought to have made alien contact if such alien life exists that could detect those same transmissions. Fermi's Paradox is an allegorical misnomer because it is subjectively geocentric therefore anthropocentrically narcissistic.

(0)   (0)
By Graeme Hill

Yes, I've had the same thought, but am apprehensive that it is a rather anthropic "we are special" point of view, when the universe has proven to be a rather cold unfeeling place that just doesn't give a damn.... but I get your point.

Cheers.

Graeme

Graeme

(0)   (1)
By Andrew Planet

I always rationalised that the meaning of life is that life is the vessel the Universe uses, in an evolutionary sense, for being self aware. A life form is part of the Universe so life is that same Universe aware of itself. At the beginning of an evolutionary tree wherever life has independently occured, the Universe would be unconsciously aware of itself until it evolved conscious intelligence.

Andrew Planet
Gibraltar
Southern Iberia

(0)   (0)
Listen LiveView webcamListen archive



  • Mid-Northland 100.7 FM
  • Whangarei 90.8 FM
  • Rodney 92.9 FM
  • Whangaparaoa 100.2 FM
  • Auckland 100.6 FM / 702 AM
  • Waikato 100.2 FM
  • Whangamata 93.1 FM
  • Bay Of Plenty 1107 AM
  • Whakatane 92.1 FM
  • Rotorua 95.1 FM
  • Gisborne 94.9 FM
  • Taupo 99.2 FM
  • Hawke's Bay 1368 AM
  • Taranaki 89.2 FM
  • Wanganui 96.0 FM
  • Manawatu 93.8 FM
  • Kapiti 99.1 FM
  • Upper Hutt 98.9 FM
  • Wairarapa 98.3 FM
  • Wellington 98.9 FM
  • Nelson 96.0 FM
  • Picton 92.3 FM
  • Blenheim 95.3 FM
  • Westport 90.1 FM
  • Kaikoura 89.1 FM
  • Christchurch 99.3 FM / 738 AM
  • Timaru 89.9 FM
  • Alexandra 95.9 FM
  • Queenstown 91.2 FM
  • Dunedin 96.6 FM
  • Southland 94.0 FM
RSS feeds
Join us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Subscribe to our Top Features Email

Copyright © 2012 MediaWorks Radio. All Rights Reserved.